Background
The Setup
The team builds outbound systems for B2B companies and agencies. The lead generation workflow runs through Clay with waterfall enrichment — every additional verified email directly translates into more opportunities for their clients.
For a long time the stack included NeverBounce alongside several other providers for email verification. Standard verifications worked well. But catch-all domains almost always remained unresolved — and nobody questioned it because that’s what every tool did.
The Problem
15-20% of Every List — Unusable
At scale, unresolved catch-all emails represent a significant portion of any lead list. Most verification providers return them as “unknown” and move on. Two bad options follow: skip them and lose the contacts, or email them blind and risk bounces.
Typical lead list before filtrat
Skip them
Lose 15-20% of potentially valid contacts
Email them blind
Risk bounces and sender reputation damage
The 15-20% catch-all segment was treated as a cost of doing business. Nobody expected those contacts to become usable.
The Switch
One Capability Changed Everything
After several months and 5,000+ email verifications, the difference became obvious. On the exact same lead lists, filtrat consistently resolved catch-all emails that the previous stack left as unknown.
Results
The Numbers
+0%
More verified contacts from the same lists
0+
Email verifications processed
1
Tool instead of combining multiple providers
Catch-all recovered
Previously unusable emails now safe to include
Unexpected Finding
Catch-All Contacts May Be Better Leads
Catch-all addresses often generated healthy reply rates. The working theory: these inboxes receive less outbound traffic than typical business emails because everyone else’s verification tool told them to skip.
“Catch-all inboxes receive less cold outreach because every other tool tells you to skip them. Less competition = higher reply rates.”
Segmenting catch-all contacts into dedicated campaigns is being tested further — early indicators suggest they outperform standard verified contacts on engagement.
Stack Change
From Multiple Providers to One
Before
NeverBounce for primary verification
Additional providers for coverage
Catch-all returned as "unknown" across all tools
15-20% of every list discarded
With Filtrat
One provider for verification + catch-all resolution
Same lead lists, 15% more verified contacts
Catch-all resolved to definitive status
Recovered contacts included in campaigns with healthy reply rates
Summary
Key Numbers
| Emails verified | 5,000+ |
| Additional verified contacts | +15% from same lists |
| Catch-all recovery | Previously 0%, now resolved |
| Providers replaced | Multiple consolidated to one |
| Catch-all reply rate | Healthy — less saturated inboxes |
| Time using filtrat | Several months |
| Status | Default verification provider |
Bottom Line
Takeaway
The switch wasn’t about replacing a broken tool — NeverBounce worked fine for standard verifications. The switch was about recovering the 15% of every list that every tool left on the table.
When outbound runs through Clay with waterfall enrichment, every additional verified email is another shot at a meeting. An extra 15% of reachable prospects from the same data, at the same sourcing cost, without adding complexity — that’s what made filtrat the default.
The unexpected bonus: catch-all contacts may actually be better leads because fewer competitors can reach them.

